Independent public-information projectNot the official LVMPD website. Taxpayer-funded, not affiliated with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Official services at lvmpd.comNot the official LVMPD site · lvmpd.comEmergency 911 · Non-emergency 311
LVMPD INFOLVMPD Public Information
Official LVMPD site ↗

Joint terrorism task force databases

Fusion centers

Last reviewed: 2026-10-27Legal review: unverifiedCapability or investigative question
Evidence rule

This page is public-interest research. An argument grade is not a court finding. A watchdog page describes the device. It is not proof a Nevada agency bought it or turned a feature on. A product description is not a Nevada practice. Agencies are not merged: the City of Las Vegas Department of Public Safety, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, the Clark County School District, the City of Reno, and the Nevada Department of Public Safety stay separate. A hotlist hit is not a confirmed crime. Legal review of this page is unverified.

What it does

A joint terrorism task force is a group of federal, state, and local investigators who share a file on cases they work together. The database is the shared case file. Membership is not the same as a fusion-center charter.

Privacy watchdog concerns

No watchdog page is attached.

Constitutional issues

Analogical constitutional argument

First Amendment, Fourth Amendment

Warrant practice not established for a Nevada agency

Joint terrorism task force databases: No Nevada task-force database is documented. NAACP v. Alabama is not a holding about a task force. No violation is claimed.

  • NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958). Analogical constitutional argument. United States Supreme Court. A task-force file raises an association question only if it holds records of lawful political or religious activity. No such file is in this build.

Statutes attached to read, not findings.

  • NRS Chapter 239. Nevada public-records law is the route to ask for contracts, policies, and logs. Citing it is not a finding that a surveillance practice is unlawful.
  • Nevada Constitution art. 1, § 18. State search-and-seizure provision. This page does not quote the section. No section anchor was verified. It is listed only where a search question is actually implicated.
  • 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A civil remedy for a deprivation of federal rights under color of state law. It is not a warrant statute, and it does not itself make a surveillance practice unlawful.

Nevada use

Not documented on this page.

Capability only.

See also: FBI data sharing; Southern Nevada Counter Terrorism Center

Next record

Joint terrorism task force databases: Do not infer membership from a fusion-center title.

All devices. A document workflow for this page is not built. The arrest correction form is not a surveillance-document inbox. Corrections and source documents for this page follow the corrections policy. Corrections policy.