Independent public-information projectNot the official LVMPD website. Taxpayer-funded, not affiliated with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Official services at lvmpd.comNot the official LVMPD site · lvmpd.comEmergency 911 · Non-emergency 311
LVMPD INFOLVMPD Public Information
Official LVMPD site ↗

Mugshot comparison

Face

Last reviewed: 2026-10-27Legal review: unverifiedCapability or investigative question
Evidence rule

This page is public-interest research. An argument grade is not a court finding. A watchdog page describes the device. It is not proof a Nevada agency bought it or turned a feature on. A product description is not a Nevada practice. Agencies are not merged: the City of Las Vegas Department of Public Safety, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, the Clark County School District, the City of Reno, and the Nevada Department of Public Safety stay separate. A hotlist hit is not a confirmed crime. Legal review of this page is unverified.

What it does

Mugshot comparison runs a probe photo against booking photos. The gallery is people who were photographed at arrest. The result is a ranked list of candidates. A human is supposed to decide whether any candidate is the person. EFF treats mugshot search as one face-recognition use and describes unequal error rates.

Privacy watchdog concerns

  • Electronic Frontier Foundation. Face Recognition. EFF says face recognition identifies or verifies a person from a photo, a video, or a live camera, including against mugshots and driver photos, and that false matches fall hardest on Black people, other minorities, women, and young people. EFF names Clearview AI as a vendor that scraped photos. This is EFF’s claim. It is not a finding that a Nevada agency bought a face system.

Constitutional issues

Unresolved question

Fourth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, Nevada Constitution art. 1, § 18

Warrant practice not established for a Nevada agency

Mugshot comparison: No Nevada mugshot-search system is documented. A booking photo is not proof the comparison tool exists. A false match is not a documented Nevada injury on this page. Carpenter does not decide the comparison.

Statutes attached to read, not findings.

  • NRS Chapter 239. Nevada public-records law is the route to ask for contracts, policies, and logs. Citing it is not a finding that a surveillance practice is unlawful.
  • Nevada Constitution art. 1, § 18. State search-and-seizure provision. This page does not quote the section. No section anchor was verified. It is listed only where a search question is actually implicated.
  • 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A civil remedy for a deprivation of federal rights under color of state law. It is not a warrant statute, and it does not itself make a surveillance practice unlawful.

Nevada use

Not documented on this page.

Capability only.

See also: Clearview-type facial recognition

Next record

Mugshot comparison: Separate booking photographs from an automated comparison tool.

All devices. A document workflow for this page is not built. The arrest correction form is not a surveillance-document inbox. Corrections and source documents for this page follow the corrections policy. Corrections policy.